South Korea vs New Caledonia: Rule of Law - Governance score
Rule of Law - Governance score over time
- South Korea
- New Caledonia
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 76.2 0-100 against 75.64 0-100 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.56 0-100.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 206 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76.07 0-100 | 74.6 0-100 | 1.47 0-100 | South Korea |
| 2020s | 76.87 0-100 | 75.58 0-100 | 1.29 0-100 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, South Korea or New Caledonia?
- South Korea, at 76.2 0-100 against 75.64 0-100 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between South Korea and New Caledonia?
- 0.56 0-100, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do South Korea and New Caledonia rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- South Korea ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 32nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).