Kiribati vs Malta: Rule of Law - Governance score
Rule of Law - Governance score over time
- Kiribati
- Malta
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 70.49 0-100 against 69.48 0-100 in Malta, a difference of 1.01 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malta ahead.
Kiribati ranks 49th and Malta ranks 51st of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.33 0-100 | 76.15 0-100 | 3.82 0-100 | Malta |
| 2000s | 69.59 0-100 | 82.14 0-100 | 12.56 0-100 | Malta |
| 2010s | 63.29 0-100 | 76.66 0-100 | 13.38 0-100 | Malta |
| 2020s | 72.53 0-100 | 71.37 0-100 | 1.15 0-100 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, Kiribati or Malta?
- Kiribati, at 70.49 0-100 against 69.48 0-100 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between Kiribati and Malta?
- 1.01 0-100, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Malta rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- Kiribati ranks 49th and Malta ranks 51st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).