French Polynesia vs Grenada: Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100)
Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100) over time
- French Polynesia
- Grenada
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 69.33 0-100 against 68.21 0-100 in Grenada, a difference of 1.12 0-100.
Across all 7 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 57th and Grenada ranks 60th of 208 countries.
French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 73.54 0-100 | 65.48 0-100 | 8.06 0-100 | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 74.47 0-100 | 67.27 0-100 | 7.2 0-100 | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, French Polynesia or Grenada?
- French Polynesia, at 69.33 0-100 against 68.21 0-100 in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 1.12 0-100, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Grenada?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do French Polynesia and Grenada rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- French Polynesia ranks 57th and Grenada ranks 60th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).