Armenia vs Malawi: Rule of Law - Governance score
Rule of Law - Governance score over time
- Armenia
- Malawi
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 54.51 0-100 against 54.45 0-100 in Malawi, a difference of 0.06 0-100.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.85 0-100 | 50.64 0-100 | 3.21 0-100 | Armenia |
| 2000s | 50.6 0-100 | 52.54 0-100 | 1.94 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 51.13 0-100 | 52.34 0-100 | 1.21 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 54.31 0-100 | 53.51 0-100 | 0.8068 0-100 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, Armenia or Malawi?
- Armenia, at 54.51 0-100 against 54.45 0-100 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between Armenia and Malawi?
- 0.06 0-100, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Malawi rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- Armenia ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 104th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).