American Samoa vs San Marino: Rule of Law - Governance score
Rule of Law - Governance score over time
- American Samoa
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 76.89 0-100 against 75.67 0-100 in American Samoa, a difference of 1.22 0-100.
Across all 21 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 31st and San Marino ranks 28th of 206 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.47 0-100 | 79.37 0-100 | 5.9 0-100 | San Marino |
| 2010s | 77.88 0-100 | 83.07 0-100 | 5.19 0-100 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 77.16 0-100 | 80.09 0-100 | 2.94 0-100 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rule of law - governance score, American Samoa or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 76.89 0-100 against 75.67 0-100 in American Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in rule of law - governance score between American Samoa and San Marino?
- 1.22 0-100, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and San Marino?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and San Marino rank globally for rule of law - governance score?
- American Samoa ranks 31st and San Marino ranks 28th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Rule of Law (RL) captures perceptions of the extent to which agents respect and follow the rules of society, including contract enforcement, property rights, the police, courts, and the likelihood of crime and violence. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).