Malaysia vs Niger: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Malaysia
-0.388
in 2025
Niger
-0.323
in 2025
Malaysia rank
119th
Niger rank
117th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Malaysia
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports -0.323 against -0.388 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.065.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Niger ahead.
Malaysia ranks 119th and Niger ranks 117th of 176 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.351 | 1.91 | 1.56 | Niger |
| 1930s | 0.351 | 1.91 | 1.56 | Niger |
| 1940s | -0.1206 | 1.91 | 2.03 | Niger |
| 1950s | 0.9164 | 2.11 | 1.19 | Niger |
| 1960s | 0.9926 | 1 | 0.0084 | Niger |
| 1970s | 0.504 | 1.48 | 0.977 | Niger |
| 1980s | -0.5937 | 1.65 | 2.25 | Niger |
| 1990s | -0.872 | -0.0975 | 0.7745 | Niger |
| 2000s | -0.7665 | 0.4389 | 1.21 | Niger |
| 2010s | -0.2287 | 1.05 | 1.28 | Niger |
| 2020s | -0.388 | 0.5262 | 0.9142 | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Malaysia or Niger?
- Niger, at -0.323 against -0.388 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Malaysia and Niger?
- 0.065, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Niger?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Niger rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Malaysia ranks 119th and Niger ranks 117th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.