Hong Kong vs Ukraine: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Hong Kong
0.218
in 2025
Ukraine
0.215
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
91st
Ukraine rank
92nd
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Ukraine
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.218 against 0.215 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.003.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 91st and Ukraine ranks 92nd of 173 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | -1.76 | 2.76 | Hong Kong |
| 1950s | 1 | -1.64 | 2.64 | Hong Kong |
| 1960s | 1 | -1.22 | 2.23 | Hong Kong |
| 1970s | 2.02 | -1.23 | 3.25 | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 2.65 | -1.22 | 3.86 | Hong Kong |
| 1990s | 2.65 | -0.7159 | 3.36 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 2.3 | -0.2062 | 2.51 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1.47 | -0.4426 | 1.92 | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 0.2383 | 0.019 | 0.2193 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Hong Kong or Ukraine?
- Hong Kong, at 0.218 against 0.215 in Ukraine as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Hong Kong and Ukraine?
- 0.003, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Ukraine?
- 80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Ukraine rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Hong Kong ranks 91st and Ukraine ranks 92nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.