Guyana vs Rwanda: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Guyana
-0.02
in 2025
Rwanda
-0.006
in 2025
Guyana rank
107th
Rwanda rank
105th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Guyana
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports -0.006 against -0.02 in Guyana, a difference of 0.014.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 10 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.413 | -1.31 | 1.72 | Guyana |
| 1920s | 0.413 | -1.31 | 1.72 | Guyana |
| 1930s | 0.413 | -1.31 | 1.72 | Guyana |
| 1940s | 0.413 | -1.31 | 1.72 | Guyana |
| 1950s | 0.5229 | -1.35 | 1.87 | Guyana |
| 1960s | 0.6636 | -0.7396 | 1.4 | Guyana |
| 1970s | 0.967 | -0.4953 | 1.46 | Guyana |
| 1980s | 0.2616 | -0.362 | 0.6236 | Guyana |
| 1990s | 0.7404 | -0.3478 | 1.09 | Guyana |
| 2000s | 0.0115 | 0.9768 | 0.9653 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.3789 | 0.756 | 0.3771 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.1823 | 0.092 | 0.0903 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Guyana or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at -0.006 against -0.02 in Guyana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Guyana and Rwanda?
- 0.014, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Rwanda?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Rwanda rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Guyana ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.