Gabon vs Japan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Gabon
1.64
in 2025
Japan
1.64
in 2025
Gabon rank
33rd
Japan rank
33rd
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Gabon
- Japan
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 1.64 against 1.64 in Japan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1910 it was Japan ahead.
Gabon ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 33rd of 176 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | -0.903 | 1.94 | 2.84 | Japan |
| 1920s | -0.903 | 1.94 | 2.84 | Japan |
| 1930s | -0.903 | 1.94 | 2.84 | Japan |
| 1940s | -0.6162 | 1.94 | 2.56 | Japan |
| 1950s | -0.1976 | 1.94 | 2.14 | Japan |
| 1960s | -0.167 | 1.94 | 2.11 | Japan |
| 1970s | -0.489 | 1.94 | 2.43 | Japan |
| 1980s | -0.489 | 1.94 | 2.43 | Japan |
| 1990s | 1.5 | 1.94 | 0.4377 | Japan |
| 2000s | 1.54 | 1.94 | 0.397 | Japan |
| 2010s | 0.7412 | 1.74 | 1 | Japan |
| 2020s | 1.56 | 1.64 | 0.0753 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Gabon or Japan?
- Gabon, at 1.64 against 1.64 in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Gabon and Japan?
- 0, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Japan?
- 116 years are reported by both, from 1910 to 2025.
- How do Gabon and Japan rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Gabon ranks 33rd and Japan ranks 33rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.