Croatia vs Kyrgyzstan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Croatia
0.616
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
0.628
in 2025
Croatia rank
75th
Kyrgyzstan rank
72nd
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Croatia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.628 against 0.616 in Croatia, a difference of 0.012.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Croatia ranks 75th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 72nd of 173 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 8 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.69 | -1.71 | 0.0159 | Croatia |
| 1950s | 0.2177 | -1.64 | 1.86 | Croatia |
| 1960s | 0.3641 | -1.22 | 1.59 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 0.614 | -1.23 | 1.84 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 1.39 | -1.22 | 2.61 | Croatia |
| 1990s | 0.0977 | 0.4234 | 0.3257 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.7578 | -0.3228 | 1.08 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.9833 | 0.48 | 0.5033 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.6205 | 0.4968 | 0.1237 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Croatia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.628 against 0.616 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Croatia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.012, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Croatia ranks 75th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 72nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.