Croatia vs Kenya: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Croatia
0.616
in 2025
Kenya
0.5
in 2025
Croatia rank
78th
Kenya rank
81st
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Croatia
- Kenya
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.616 against 0.5 in Kenya, a difference of 0.116.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Kenya ahead.
Croatia ranks 78th and Kenya ranks 81st of 176 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 7 and Kenya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.69 | -0.885 | 0.8052 | Kenya |
| 1950s | 0.2177 | -2.02 | 2.24 | Croatia |
| 1960s | 0.3641 | -0.9023 | 1.27 | Croatia |
| 1970s | 0.614 | -0.826 | 1.44 | Croatia |
| 1980s | 1.39 | -1.21 | 2.6 | Croatia |
| 1990s | 0.0977 | -1.08 | 1.18 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.7578 | 0.2512 | 0.5066 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.9833 | 0.8118 | 0.1715 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.6205 | 0.8653 | 0.2448 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Croatia or Kenya?
- Croatia, at 0.616 against 0.5 in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Croatia and Kenya?
- 0.116, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Kenya?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Kenya rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Croatia ranks 78th and Kenya ranks 81st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.