Croatia vs Fiji: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Croatia
0.616
in 2025
Fiji
0.58
in 2025
Croatia rank
78th
Fiji rank
79th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Croatia
- Fiji
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0.616 against 0.58 in Fiji, a difference of 0.036.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Fiji's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Fiji ahead.
Croatia ranks 78th and Fiji ranks 79th of 176 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Fiji in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -1.69 | 2.52 | 4.21 | Fiji |
| 1950s | 0.2177 | 2.52 | 2.3 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.3641 | 2.52 | 2.15 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 0.614 | 2.52 | 1.91 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 1.39 | 1.5 | 0.1113 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 0.0977 | 1.03 | 0.9352 | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.7578 | -0.3824 | 1.14 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.9833 | -0.1 | 1.08 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.6205 | 0.7385 | 0.118 | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Croatia or Fiji?
- Croatia, at 0.616 against 0.58 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Croatia and Fiji?
- 0.036, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Fiji?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Fiji rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Croatia ranks 78th and Fiji ranks 79th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.