Colombia vs Croatia: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Colombia
0.627
in 2025
Croatia
0.616
in 2025
Colombia rank
76th
Croatia rank
78th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Colombia
- Croatia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 0.627 against 0.616 in Croatia, a difference of 0.011.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 76th and Croatia ranks 78th of 176 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 8.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | -0.8571 | -1.69 | 0.8331 | Colombia |
| 1950s | -1.84 | 0.2177 | 2.06 | Croatia |
| 1960s | -0.198 | 0.3641 | 0.5621 | Croatia |
| 1970s | -0.198 | 0.614 | 0.812 | Croatia |
| 1980s | -0.3768 | 1.39 | 1.77 | Croatia |
| 1990s | -0.645 | 0.0977 | 0.7427 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0.3302 | 0.7578 | 0.4276 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0.8806 | 0.9833 | 0.1027 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0.5877 | 0.6205 | 0.0328 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Colombia or Croatia?
- Colombia, at 0.627 against 0.616 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Colombia and Croatia?
- 0.011, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Croatia?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Croatia rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Colombia ranks 76th and Croatia ranks 78th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.