Cameroon vs Madagascar: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Cameroon
-1.7
in 2025
Madagascar
-1.62
in 2025
Cameroon rank
160th
Madagascar rank
157th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Cameroon
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports -1.62 against -1.7 in Cameroon, a difference of 0.08.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.
Cameroon ranks 160th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 176 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.208 | 0.57 | 0.778 | Madagascar |
| 1970s | -0.5606 | -0.1272 | 0.4334 | Madagascar |
| 1980s | -1.25 | -0.699 | 0.5482 | Madagascar |
| 1990s | -0.9662 | -0.6525 | 0.3137 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | -1.09 | -0.0931 | 0.9973 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | -1.47 | -1.26 | 0.2104 | Madagascar |
| 2020s | -1.69 | -0.7535 | 0.939 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Cameroon or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at -1.62 against -1.7 in Cameroon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 0.08, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Madagascar?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Cameroon and Madagascar rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Cameroon ranks 160th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.