Bangladesh vs Vietnam: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Bangladesh
-0.766
in 2025
Vietnam
-0.781
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
128th
Vietnam rank
130th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Vietnam
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports -0.766 against -0.781 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.015.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Vietnam ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 128th and Vietnam ranks 130th of 173 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Vietnam in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -1.14 | -1.22 | 0.078 | Bangladesh |
| 1980s | -1.04 | -1.2 | 0.1606 | Bangladesh |
| 1990s | -0.7677 | -1.18 | 0.4156 | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | -0.9293 | -0.6437 | 0.2856 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | -1.54 | -0.5148 | 1.02 | Vietnam |
| 2020s | -1.62 | -0.5675 | 1.05 | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Bangladesh or Vietnam?
- Bangladesh, at -0.766 against -0.781 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Bangladesh and Vietnam?
- 0.015, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Vietnam?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Vietnam rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Bangladesh ranks 128th and Vietnam ranks 130th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.