Tanzania, United Republic of vs Togo: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Tanzania, United Republic of
56.25
in 2019
Togo
56.25
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
85th
Togo rank
85th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Togo
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Togo, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 85th and Togo ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35.71 | 56.25 | 20.54 | Togo |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Tanzania, United Republic of or Togo?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Togo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Tanzania, United Republic of and Togo?
- 0, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Togo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Togo rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 85th and Togo ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.