Solomon Islands vs Vanuatu: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Solomon Islands
37.5
in 2019
Vanuatu
37.5
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
133rd
Vanuatu rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Solomon Islands
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Solomon Islands ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 1 and Vanuatu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25 | 31.25 | 6.25 | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 36.25 | 33.75 | 2.5 | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Solomon Islands or Vanuatu?
- Solomon Islands, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Solomon Islands and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and Vanuatu rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.