Sierra Leone vs Solomon Islands: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Sierra Leone
37.5
in 2019
Solomon Islands
37.5
in 2019
Sierra Leone rank
133rd
Solomon Islands rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Sierra Leone
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 133rd and Solomon Islands ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.14 | 25 | 7.14 | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 36.25 | 1.25 | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Sierra Leone or Solomon Islands?
- Sierra Leone, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sierra Leone and Solomon Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Sierra Leone ranks 133rd and Solomon Islands ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.