San Marino vs Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
San Marino
28.12
in 2019
Sudan
25
in 2019
San Marino rank
155th
Sudan rank
156th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- San Marino
- Sudan
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 28.12 against 25 in Sudan, a difference of 3.12.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sudan ahead.
San Marino ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 156th of 191 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 18.75 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 21.88 | 6.25 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), San Marino or Sudan?
- San Marino, at 28.12 against 25 in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between San Marino and Sudan?
- 3.12, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Sudan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Sudan rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- San Marino ranks 155th and Sudan ranks 156th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.