San Marino vs Saint Lucia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
San Marino
28.12
in 2019
Saint Lucia
25
in 2019
San Marino rank
155th
Saint Lucia rank
156th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- San Marino
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 28.12 against 25 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 3.12.
That makes San Marino's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
San Marino ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.75 | 25 | 6.25 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 28.12 | 25 | 3.12 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), San Marino or Saint Lucia?
- San Marino, at 28.12 against 25 in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 3.12, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Saint Lucia rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- San Marino ranks 155th and Saint Lucia ranks 156th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.