Philippines vs Poland: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Philippines
87.5
in 2019
Poland
87.5
in 2019
Philippines rank
12th
Poland rank
12th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Philippines
- Poland
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in Poland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 12th and Poland ranks 12th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.62 | 75 | 9.38 | Poland |
| 2010s | 85.31 | 81.88 | 3.44 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Philippines or Poland?
- Philippines, at 87.5 against 87.5 in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Philippines and Poland?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Poland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Poland rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Philippines ranks 12th and Poland ranks 12th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.