Papua New Guinea vs Vanuatu: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Papua New Guinea
37.5
in 2019
Vanuatu
37.5
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
133rd
Vanuatu rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 31.25 | 6.25 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 33.75 | 3.75 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Papua New Guinea or Vanuatu?
- Papua New Guinea, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Vanuatu rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.