North Macedonia vs Puerto Rico: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
North Macedonia
93.75
in 2019
Puerto Rico
93.75
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
2nd
Puerto Rico rank
2nd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- North Macedonia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 2nd and Puerto Rico ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.36 | 93.75 | 13.39 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 90 | 93.75 | 3.75 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), North Macedonia or Puerto Rico?
- North Macedonia, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Puerto Rico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
- 0, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Puerto Rico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Puerto Rico rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- North Macedonia ranks 2nd and Puerto Rico ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.