Niger vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Niger
56.25
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
56.25
in 2019
Niger rank
85th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
85th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Niger
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Niger currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Niger ahead.
Niger ranks 85th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 35.71 | 20.54 | Niger |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Niger or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Niger, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Niger and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Niger and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Niger ranks 85th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.