New Zealand vs Viet Nam: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
New Zealand
53.12
in 2019
Viet Nam
53.12
in 2019
New Zealand rank
102nd
Viet Nam rank
102nd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- New Zealand
- Viet Nam
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 102nd and Viet Nam ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.43 | 43.3 | 3.12 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 53.12 | 50 | 3.12 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), New Zealand or Viet Nam?
- New Zealand, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Viet Nam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between New Zealand and Viet Nam?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Viet Nam?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- New Zealand ranks 102nd and Viet Nam ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.