New Zealand vs Singapore: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
New Zealand
53.12
in 2019
Singapore
53.12
in 2019
New Zealand rank
102nd
Singapore rank
102nd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- New Zealand
- Singapore
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 53.12 against 53.12 in Singapore, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.43 | 53.12 | 6.7 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 53.12 | 53.12 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), New Zealand or Singapore?
- New Zealand, at 53.12 against 53.12 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between New Zealand and Singapore?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- New Zealand ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 102nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.