Netherlands vs South Africa: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Netherlands
71.88
in 2019
South Africa
71.88
in 2019
Netherlands rank
44th
South Africa rank
44th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Netherlands
- South Africa
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 71.88 against 71.88 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.88 | 53.12 | 18.75 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 71.88 | 70 | 1.88 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Netherlands or South Africa?
- Netherlands, at 71.88 against 71.88 in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Netherlands and South Africa?
- 0, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and South Africa rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Netherlands ranks 44th and South Africa ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.