Mozambique vs Seychelles: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Mozambique
62.5
in 2019
Seychelles
62.5
in 2019
Mozambique rank
74th
Seychelles rank
74th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Mozambique
- Seychelles
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 62.5 against 62.5 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Seychelles ahead.
Mozambique ranks 74th and Seychelles ranks 74th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.07 | 31.25 | 15.18 | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 52.5 | 50 | 2.5 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Mozambique or Seychelles?
- Mozambique, at 62.5 against 62.5 in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Mozambique and Seychelles?
- 0, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Seychelles?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Seychelles rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Mozambique ranks 74th and Seychelles ranks 74th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.