Montenegro vs Thailand: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Montenegro
78.12
in 2019
Thailand
78.12
in 2019
Montenegro rank
28th
Thailand rank
28th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Montenegro
- Thailand
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 78.12 against 78.12 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Thailand ahead.
Montenegro ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 28th of 191 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.88 | 71.88 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 77.5 | 74.06 | 3.44 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Montenegro or Thailand?
- Montenegro, at 78.12 against 78.12 in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Montenegro and Thailand?
- 0, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Montenegro and Thailand rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Montenegro ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 28th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.