Mongolia vs Sierra Leone: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Mongolia
40.62
in 2019
Sierra Leone
37.5
in 2019
Mongolia rank
131st
Sierra Leone rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Mongolia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 40.62 against 37.5 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 3.12.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 32.14 | 8.48 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 37.5 | 3.12 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Mongolia or Sierra Leone?
- Mongolia, at 40.62 against 37.5 in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Mongolia and Sierra Leone?
- 3.12, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sierra Leone?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Sierra Leone rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Mongolia ranks 131st and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.