Mongolia vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Mongolia
40.62
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
37.5
in 2019
Mongolia rank
131st
Papua New Guinea rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Mongolia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 40.62 against 37.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 3.12.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 37.5 | 3.12 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 37.5 | 3.12 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Mongolia or Papua New Guinea?
- Mongolia, at 40.62 against 37.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
- 3.12, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Mongolia ranks 131st and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.