Mongolia vs Namibia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)

Mongolia
40.62
in 2019
Namibia
37.5
in 2019
Mongolia rank
128th
Namibia rank
130th

Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
010203040200320112019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 40.62 against 37.5 in Namibia, a difference of 3.12.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 188 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 40.62 37.5 3.12 Mongolia
2010s 40.62 37.5 3.12 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Mongolia or Namibia?
Mongolia, at 40.62 against 37.5 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Mongolia and Namibia?
3.12, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
Mongolia ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.