Republic of Moldova vs Morocco: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Republic of Moldova
75
in 2019
Morocco
75
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
30th
Morocco rank
30th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Morocco
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 75 against 75 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 30th and Morocco ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75 | 37.5 | 37.5 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 75 | 45 | 30 | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Republic of Moldova or Morocco?
- Republic of Moldova, at 75 against 75 in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Republic of Moldova and Morocco?
- 0, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Morocco rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 30th and Morocco ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.