Micronesia (country) vs Pakistan: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Micronesia (country)
71.88
in 2019
Pakistan
71.88
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
44th
Pakistan rank
44th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Pakistan
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 71.88 against 71.88 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Pakistan ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 44th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.07 | 43.75 | 2.68 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 71.88 | 49.38 | 22.5 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Micronesia (country) or Pakistan?
- Micronesia (country), at 71.88 against 71.88 in Pakistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Micronesia (country) and Pakistan?
- 0, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Pakistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Pakistan rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 44th and Pakistan ranks 44th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.