Republic of Korea vs Spain: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Republic of Korea
75
in 2019
Spain
75
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
30th
Spain rank
30th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Republic of Korea
- Spain
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 75 against 75 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 30th and Spain ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75 | 62.5 | 12.5 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 75 | 75 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Republic of Korea or Spain?
- Republic of Korea, at 75 against 75 in Spain as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Republic of Korea and Spain?
- 0, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Spain?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Spain rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 30th and Spain ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.