Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Yemen: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Iran, Islamic Republic of
31.25
in 2019
Yemen
31.25
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
146th
Yemen rank
146th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Yemen
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Yemen, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Yemen has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 146th and Yemen ranks 146th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 31.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Yemen?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Yemen as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen?
- 0, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Yemen rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 146th and Yemen ranks 146th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.