Hong Kong, China vs Vanuatu: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Hong Kong, China
37.5
in 2019
Vanuatu
37.5
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
133rd
Vanuatu rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 31.25 | 6.25 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 33.75 | 3.75 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Hong Kong, China or Vanuatu?
- Hong Kong, China, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 133rd and Vanuatu ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.