Czechia vs Philippines: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Czechia
87.5
in 2019
Philippines
87.5
in 2019
Czechia rank
12th
Philippines rank
12th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Czechia
- Philippines
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 87.5 against 87.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Philippines ahead.
Czechia ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.09 | 65.62 | 4.46 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 86.88 | 85.31 | 1.56 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Czechia or Philippines?
- Czechia, at 87.5 against 87.5 in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Czechia and Philippines?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Philippines?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Czechia and Philippines rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Czechia ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.