Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Costa Rica
37.5
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
37.5
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
133rd
Papua New Guinea rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Costa Rica
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.