Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Costa Rica
37.5
in 2019
Mongolia
40.62
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
133rd
Mongolia rank
131st
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 40.62 against 37.5 in Costa Rica, a difference of 3.12.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Mongolia ranks 131st of 191 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 40.62 | 3.12 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 40.62 | 3.12 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 40.62 against 37.5 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 3.12, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Mongolia ranks 131st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.