Costa Rica vs Eswatini: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Costa Rica
37.5
in 2019
Eswatini
37.5
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
133rd
Eswatini rank
133rd
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Costa Rica
- Eswatini
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 37.5 against 37.5 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.5 | 25 | 12.5 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Costa Rica or Eswatini?
- Costa Rica, at 37.5 against 37.5 in Eswatini as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Costa Rica and Eswatini?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Eswatini?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Eswatini rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Costa Rica ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 133rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.