Cameroon vs Kyrgyzstan: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Cameroon
56.25
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
56.25
in 2019
Cameroon rank
85th
Kyrgyzstan rank
85th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Cameroon
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Cameroon ahead.
Cameroon ranks 85th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 37.5 | 18.75 | Cameroon |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 41.25 | 15 | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Cameroon or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cameroon, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Cameroon ranks 85th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.