Cameroon vs Central African Republic: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Cameroon
56.25
in 2019
Central African Republic
56.25
in 2019
Cameroon rank
85th
Central African Republic rank
85th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Cameroon
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 85th and Central African Republic ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 56.25 | 56.25 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Cameroon or Central African Republic?
- Cameroon, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Central African Republic rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Cameroon ranks 85th and Central African Republic ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.