Brunei Darussalam vs Taiwan: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Brunei Darussalam
65.62
in 2019
Taiwan
65.62
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
67th
Taiwan rank
67th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Taiwan
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 65.62 against 65.62 in Taiwan, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Taiwan has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Taiwan ranks 67th of 191 countries.
Taiwan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25 | 65.62 | 40.62 | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 39.38 | 65.62 | 26.25 | Taiwan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Brunei Darussalam or Taiwan?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 65.62 against 65.62 in Taiwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Brunei Darussalam and Taiwan?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Taiwan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Taiwan rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 67th and Taiwan ranks 67th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.