Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mongolia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
40.62
in 2019
Mongolia
40.62
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
130th
Mongolia rank
130th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Mongolia
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 40.62 against 40.62 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 130th and Mongolia ranks 130th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 40.62 | 40.62 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Mongolia?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 40.62 against 40.62 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mongolia rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 130th and Mongolia ranks 130th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.