Antigua and Barbuda vs Malta: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Antigua and Barbuda
31.25
in 2019
Malta
34.38
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
146th
Malta rank
145th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 34.38 against 31.25 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 3.13.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Malta ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 34.38 | 3.12 | Malta |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 34.38 | 3.12 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Antigua and Barbuda or Malta?
- Malta, at 34.38 against 31.25 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Antigua and Barbuda and Malta?
- 3.13, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Malta?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Malta rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Malta ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.