Antigua and Barbuda vs Ecuador: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
Antigua and Barbuda
31.25
in 2019
Ecuador
31.25
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
146th
Ecuador rank
146th
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Ecuador
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 31.25 against 31.25 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Ecuador ranks 146th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.25 | 28.12 | 3.12 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 31.25 | 29.69 | 1.56 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), Antigua and Barbuda or Ecuador?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 31.25 against 31.25 in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Ecuador rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 146th and Ecuador ranks 146th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.