Trinidad and Tobago vs United Arab Emirates: Resolving insolvency - Score
Trinidad and Tobago
48.45
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
49.26
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
81st
United Arab Emirates rank
78th
Resolving insolvency - Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 49.26 against 48.45 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.81.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 188 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.31 | 39.76 | 7.44 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 42.38 | 43.27 | 0.8835 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Trinidad and Tobago or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 49.26 against 48.45 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Trinidad and Tobago and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.81, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and United Arab Emirates rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st and United Arab Emirates ranks 78th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.