Mozambique vs Trinidad and Tobago: Resolving insolvency - Score

Mozambique
47.82
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
48.45
in 2019
Mozambique rank
84th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
81st

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Trinidad and Tobago
1020304050200320112019

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 48.45 against 47.82 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.63.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Mozambique ranks 84th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 24.57 32.31 7.75 Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 42.93 42.38 0.5489 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Mozambique or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 48.45 against 47.82 in Mozambique as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.63, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Mozambique and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Mozambique ranks 84th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 81st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.