Equatorial Guinea vs Marshall Islands: Resolving insolvency - Score

Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2019
Marshall Islands
9.19
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th
Marshall Islands rank
165th

Resolving insolvency - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Marshall Islands
0246810200320112019

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 9.19 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 9.19.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 188 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0 9.6 9.6 Marshall Islands
2010s 0 9.37 9.37 Marshall Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher resolving insolvency - score, Equatorial Guinea or Marshall Islands?
Marshall Islands, at 9.19 against 0 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in resolving insolvency - score between Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
9.19, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Marshall Islands rank globally for resolving insolvency - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Marshall Islands ranks 165th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for resolving insolvency is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the recovery rate of insolvency proceedings involving domestic entities, as well as the strength of the legal framework applicable to judicial liquidation and reorganization proceedings.